There exists a bustling care network where over 4.5 million people rely on home- and community-based services (HCBS) for their daily well-being, yet behind the scenes, an urgent drama unfolds—a shortage of direct care workers struggling under low wages and high demands.
Welcome to the world of Medicaid home care, where state policymakers, frontline workers, and innovative administrators are locked in a battle against time (and budget cuts) to ensure that care keeps on ticking.
At the heart of our story lies a paradox. On one hand, states are witnessing unprecedented demand for Medicaid home care services—services that are often the lifeline for those who need care in the comfort of their own homes.
On the other, the workforce providing these vital services is stretched thin. Direct support professionals, personal care attendants, nursing staff, and case managers are in short supply across the board, with every state reporting shortages in at least one category.
In fact, in a 2024 survey of state officials, every single respondent confirmed they were grappling with these challenges.
In the past year, 41 states have seen the permanent shuttering of their home care provider services—a stark signal of deep-seated challenges in the sector. Meanwhile, among the 34 states that tracked hourly wages for personal care providers, more than half are offering less than $20 per hour, highlighting a persistent struggle to attract and retain essential workers. – KFF
It’s a classic case of “too little, too late”—but states aren’t standing idly by. They’re rolling up their sleeves and rethinking payment structures in hopes of turning the tide.
A majority of home care workers clock in long, spend physically demanding hours, yet earn less than the living wage. It’s no wonder that turnover is high and positions remain unfilled. The survey tells us that for personal care providers, the median payment rate is about $18 per hour. Home health aides fare a bit better at a median of $40 per hour, while registered nurses—whose expertise is indispensable—receive a median of $64 per hour. Yet, even these figures vary wildly across states.
Some states report rates as low as below $10 per hour for personal care providers, while others reach into the mid-$20s. Agency payment rates, too, display a broad spectrum: personal care agencies charge anywhere from $14 to $176 per hour, and home health agencies from $25 to a jaw-dropping $154 per hour.
Such variation paints a picture of a system that is both diverse and disjointed, with each state crafting its own strategy to attract and retain the very workers who form the backbone of Medicaid home care.
States aren’t relying solely on boosting wages—they’re deploying an arsenal of innovative strategies to plug the workforce gap. Beyond simply increasing payment rates (a tactic employed by all 48 responding states), many are investing in education and training programs, rolling out incentive payments, and even considering policies like paid sick leave and state minimum wage hikes specifically for HCBS workers.
In some corners of the country, initiatives are even underway to allow family members to receive payment for the care they provide—a move that might just turn the tide in communities where formal care services are scarce.
Yet, amid all this creative policymaking, a shadow looms large: proposed federal spending cuts. House Republicans are eyeing a $2.3 trillion reduction in Medicaid spending over the next decade.
This proposal threatens to force states into a fiscal corner, where maintaining or even increasing current payment rates may become a luxury rather than a policy priority. When nearly 70% of home care is paid for by Medicaid, any significant cut in federal dollars could have a profound impact on both the workforce and the millions of enrollees who depend on their care.
Not long ago, the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) provided states with an extra $37 billion in federal funding, a much-needed lifeline that enabled expanded home care services and bolstered the workforce through recruitment, retention, and training initiatives.
But as the ARPA funds begin to dry up—with most states expected to exhaust these resources by March 2025 (or extended slightly to September 2026 for a few)—the question looms: Can states maintain the higher payment rates that have helped them stave off workforce shortages?
Most states have made it clear that preserving these enhanced payment rates is their top priority. Out of 44 states surveyed on their post-ARPA plans, 30 declared that continuing increased provider payment rates is essential. Other priorities, such as expanding services or reducing waiting lists, take a back seat in this fiscal tug-of-war.
Adding another twist to the tale, the Biden Administration’s final Access Rule—released in May 2024—sets out sweeping requirements aimed at ensuring transparency in Medicaid home care payments. Starting July 2026, states will be required to report hourly payment rates for a host of services, including personal care, homemaker services, and home health aide services.
This rule mandates not only a breakdown of payment rates but also a detailed accounting of how many Medicaid claims were paid at those rates and how many enrollees received services.
Moreover, the rule stipulates that by 2030, at least 80% of payments to Medicaid providers must go directly to direct care workers. This new standard is a double-edged sword—it promises greater fairness and accountability for workers, yet it also underscores the critical importance of knowing precisely how much of the money trickles down to the frontlines.
It’s a bold step toward leveling the playing field, but it also highlights the challenges states face in tracking and reporting a maze of payment data, especially in environments where services are bundled and negotiated on a case-by-case basis.
While states are busy tinkering with payment rates and rolling out innovative support measures, the reality on the ground remains grim. In the past year alone, 41 states have reported permanent closures of home care providers.
These closures aren’t confined to one type of service—they span adult day health programs, assisted living facilities, group homes, and even providers who deliver care directly in enrollees’ homes. Such shutdowns not only signal the financial and operational strains within the industry but also serve as a stark reminder of how delicate the balance is between available funds and the rising costs of care.
When providers close shop, the immediate consequence is a shrinking pool of available services—services that are already in high demand due to the complex and often overwhelming needs of Medicaid enrollees. The domino effect is clear: fewer providers mean longer waiting lists, overburdened remaining staff, and ultimately, diminished quality of care for some of the most vulnerable citizens.
Let’s take a moment to appreciate the almost carnival-like array of numbers in this saga. It’s a roller coaster where the highs are $176 per hour for some personal care agencies, while the lows dip below $10 per hour for personal care providers in certain states. It’s a ride that leaves you both exhilarated and uneasy—exhilarated by the potential for creative solutions and uneasy by the stark disparities that highlight systemic inequities.
These numbers are more than mere statistics—they’re the lifeblood of policy debates, the fuel for grassroots advocacy, and the hard-edged reality for workers who struggle to make ends meet.
Every dollar raised is a small victory against the forces that drive shortages and burnout, and every closure of a provider is a sobering reminder of the work yet to be done.
In the grand narrative of Medicaid home care, states are both the stage and the actors. They’re navigating a labyrinth of financial pressures, workforce shortages, and regulatory challenges—all while striving to provide compassionate care to millions. The story is one of resilience, innovation, and a relentless commitment to ensuring that every individual receives the dignified care they deserve.
For those of us watching from the sidelines—whether as policymakers, advocates, or simply engaged citizens—the unfolding drama offers vital lessons about the intersection of fiscal policy and human welfare. It challenges us to question how we value care work and to imagine a future where compensation is commensurate with the dedication and skill required to deliver life-sustaining services.
So, as you scroll through this blog and ponder the complexities of Medicaid home care payment rates, remember that behind every statistic is a human story—a story of workers fighting against the odds and of states striving to make a difference in the lives of millions.
And in this story, every innovative policy and every raised payment rate is a step toward a brighter, more equitable future for home care across America.
Download Blog
Our users reported 95% customer satisfaction in 2024. Schedule a personal walkthrough to see CareSmartz360 in action.
AI Hub
